531
byf
the employment of Constaties
or Watchina.
Mr Arthur is at present held responsible for the perform
Arrace/
of those duties, but, I think, as he
states,
that
they
cam
caudere a as
seasedly be coming within the
scope of his duties as First Crk-
only.
As
an alternative M
Arthur applies that
the increase
can viol
be
granted
if a irrespective of
Quarters he
be allowed to
bail is allowed under Ordinance
10 of 1890, and his liabili
ability to be informations
called upon to take in
under the recent Gambling Ordinance
ختم خوبم
consider it
necessary
than
ever that the First Clerk should reside on the premises, or in very
ze ar
the
provimity to the Magistracy.
question of a
The
a caretaker
emplopment of Constables, or
watchinen world then also have
to be sonsidered
may
draw it and provvide his own
quarters.
This arran
arrangement
be greatly to his
-apparently be
would
advanta age compared with his
present position in reference to salary
and have allowances, but
scarcely
ACCOUVU end it,
avin
view of the powers given the First
Cleak to take
recognizances.
nces where/
bail
peculiar
to that of
Mr Arthur's case is a
are alld woh
of analogous
any
other officer
"occupying Quarters, and
in his favour would not therefore
form
precedent, nor affect as
nca de
cairn
thank it was
any
by others, and I very unfortunate for hein that the Secretary of State while considering the question of mcreases had not before him the
information.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.